(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
By James Saft
Aug 10 (Reuters) - The formerly staid, predictable world of utilities investing faces a revolution as the price of solar and wind energy plunges, creating new winners and losers.
Generally tightly regulated and thus with reliable cash flows, utility stocks and bonds have long been beloved by pension funds and other conservative investors for their safe income generation.
But dramatic falls in the cost of solar and wind energy pose a threat to that safe profile, potentially leaving utilities with large and increasingly un-economic sunk costs in older generating technologies.
Average whole life project costs for large wind and solar generation in the United States are now less than for coal or nuclear and about the same as natural gas, according to a study of tax subsidy-neutral prices from investment bank Lazard.
“Numerous key markets recently reached an inflection point where renewables have become the cheapest form of new power generation, a dynamic we see spreading to nearly every country we cover by 2020,” Morgan Stanley analysts said in a report released in July. “We project large reductions in carbon intensity in the global power sector, driven by the seismic shift in renewables.”
To be sure, cheaper and cleaner energy is a good problem to have. Morgan Stanley predicts that President Donald Trump’s announced withdrawal aside, the United States will meet its 2025 Paris Agreement target of a 26 percent to 28 percent reduction in 2005 carbon emissions.
The pace of change has been breathtaking. Morgan Stanley says the cost of solar panels has fallen by 50 percent in less than two years. At the same time, engineering improvements are allowing for larger wind turbine blades, fueling exponential improvements in wind economics.
That’s great news, but not if you are or own a utility representing a big embedded bet on other technologies that are being put at a disadvantage by the fall in solar and wind generating costs.
South Carolina state-owned Santee Cooper and publicly traded SCANA Corp. said last month they will abandon construction of two nuclear power plants after cost overruns, equipment problems and the bankruptcy of contractor Westinghouse Electric.
Southern Co. recently said it will suspend work on a plan to use coal gasification at a plant in Mississippi and faces tough choices over a planned nuclear facility under construction.
Solar and wind also tend to suppress power pricing in markets with competition because, as their power is essentially free once upfront build-out costs are out the door, they not only displace higher-cost existing technologies that usually meet peak marginal demand, but lower the entire pricing structure.
The revolution in the utility power-generating model will create winners as well as losers, with some incumbents who are already exposed to more competition and who’ve taken steps to adjust ahead of the game.
Regardless of how the chips fall, the stark truth is that there will be far more chips up in the air in the world of utilities than in any identifiable earlier period. This implies more volatility, both in earnings and in the trading of utilities securities, which benefit from a long-term shareholder base featuring heavy exposure from pension funds and insurers.
As earnings and trading volatility rise, it is reasonable to expect investors to require better prospective returns to compensate them for the risks. The Dow Jones Utilities index’ components are trading at a higher price/earnings multiple, 19.82, than the broad index, but at far less of a premium than only a year ago.
That fall in multiples may have further to run. Much depends on regulation, and it is certain that utilities, which are well embedded in the political processes of their home districts, will exert powerful influence to protect their margins where possible.
Green power may also face political backlash from the Trump administration, either in the form of tariffs on solar panels, many of which are made in China, or in other forms intended to protect the coal industry.
But it is also true that politicians and their voters both have good reason not to want their utilities to face dire consequences.
While governments may fear instability in power generation and seek to shield incumbents, industry and jobs will generally follow cheap power, a point forcefully illustrated by the history of the Tennessee Valley Authority. At some point, if the economics of solar and wind continue to improve, the politics of suppressing that will become untenable.
What’s clear in all of this is that as solar and wind drive generating prices down, utility investors face an unprecedented set of opportunities and risks. (At the time of publication James Saft did not own any direct investments in securities mentioned in this article. He may be an owner indirectly as an investor in a fund. You can email him at firstname.lastname@example.org and find more columns at blogs.reuters.com/james-saft) (Editing by Dan Grebler)